QwQ 32B
Benchmarks
preference
Crowdsourced pairwise human preference rankings of LLM responses. Higher Elo means more frequently preferred by users.
knowledge
Harder version of MMLU testing knowledge across 57 academic subjects; reduces guessing-friendly answers.
reasoning
Graduate-level Google-proof Q&A in physics, chemistry, and biology. Diamond subset is the hardest tier with PhD-validated answers.
math
500 high-school competition math problems requiring multi-step solutions. Scored on final-answer correctness.
AIME-style competition problems written specifically for the OTIS mock contest, then run as an evaluation by Epoch AI. Closer in spirit to the public AIME but with novel problems unlikely to appear in training data.
instruction following
Verifiable instruction-following benchmark; 25 categories of strict formatting / structural directives.
coding
Real-world refactoring and bug-fix tasks across multiple programming languages, scored by whether the model produces a passing patch in Aider's edit format. Tests practical coding ability beyond single-file generation; harder than HumanEval and not yet saturated.
composite
Saturation-resistant composite capability score stitched together from ~40 underlying benchmarks using Item Response Theory. Each benchmark is weighted by its fitted difficulty and discriminative slope, so doing well on hard, contamination-resistant evals (FrontierMath, ARC-AGI 2, Humanity's Last Exam) moves the score and saturated benchmarks contribute almost nothing. Imported per-model from Epoch AI's published index; we anchor it to the same min-max scale we use for every other benchmark so it's directly weightable in scenarios.
Reliability monitor
Loading drift signal…
Hosted endpoints
No third-party hosts tracked for this model — available only from its primary provider.