Mistral Large 2
Price from the model maker's own API, verified 8h ago · cached input $0.20 /M
Benchmarks
preference
Crowdsourced pairwise human preference rankings of LLM responses. Higher Elo means more frequently preferred by users.
knowledge
Harder version of MMLU testing knowledge across 57 academic subjects; reduces guessing-friendly answers.
reasoning
Graduate-level Google-proof Q&A in physics, chemistry, and biology. Diamond subset is the hardest tier with PhD-validated answers.
math
500 high-school competition math problems requiring multi-step solutions. Scored on final-answer correctness.
American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2024 problems. Three-digit integer answers; very hard for non-reasoning models.
Mathematical research problems spanning analysis, algebra, combinatorics and number theory. Tiers 1-3 are progressively harder; even frontier reasoning models only solve a small fraction. The hardest publicly reported benchmark for general mathematical reasoning.
AIME-style competition problems written specifically for the OTIS mock contest, then run as an evaluation by Epoch AI. Closer in spirit to the public AIME but with novel problems unlikely to appear in training data.
coding
164 hand-written Python programming problems scored by passing unit tests. Saturated for frontier models.
instruction following
Verifiable instruction-following benchmark; 25 categories of strict formatting / structural directives.
long context
Long-context retrieval and reasoning suite. We report the 128k token effective-context score.
performance
Median output speed in tokens per second over the last 14 days on the model maker's own API, measured nightly with a fixed ~800-token prompt and ~250-token answer. Models not yet probed fall back to a dated manual figure. Higher is faster.
Median time from request to first streamed token in milliseconds over the last 14 days on the model maker's own API, using the same nightly probe prompt. Lower is snappier; reasoning models are penalised here because they think before talking.
composite
Saturation-resistant composite capability score stitched together from ~40 underlying benchmarks using Item Response Theory. Each benchmark is weighted by its fitted difficulty and discriminative slope, so doing well on hard, contamination-resistant evals (FrontierMath, ARC-AGI 2, Humanity's Last Exam) moves the score and saturated benchmarks contribute almost nothing. Imported per-model from Epoch AI's published index; we anchor it to the same min-max scale we use for every other benchmark so it's directly weightable in scenarios.
Reliability monitor
Loading drift signal…
Hosted endpoints
| Host | Input $/M | Output $/M | Context | Speed | TTFT | Uptime 24h | Quant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Host 40maker's API | $2.00 | $6.00 | 128k | 53 tok/s | 0.82 s | 100.0% | unknown |
| Host 41maker's API | $2.20 | $6.60 | 128k | — | — | — | unknown |