Skip to content
← Leaderboard

GPT-6.1 Terra

Closed
OpenAI
Proprietary
text
vision
Released 1d ago
Avg score
66.9
/ 100 · not enough data for the index
Context
1.1M
Output limit
128k
Input price
$0.50 /M
Output price
$2.50 /M

Price from the model maker's own API, verified 9h ago · batch jobs 50% off · cached input $0.03 /M

Added automatically from the public model catalog. Family and licence details are not curated yet; benchmark scores appear as upstream leaderboards list this model.

Benchmarks

reliability

Output StabilityN/A
/100

How consistent the model's outputs are across repeated runs of the same task. Higher means lower variance, fewer occasional hallucinations under identical inputs. Useful for production loops that need reproducible behaviour.

Format AdherenceN/A
/100

How reliably the model produces output in the requested format (JSON schemas, markdown structures, exact-string responses). Pairs well with IFEval but reflects how the deployed API is behaving day to day rather than how a frozen test set scores.

Recovery RateN/A
/100

How often the model self-corrects after producing an incorrect intermediate step (debugging axis upstream). Critical for agentic loops that depend on the model noticing and repairing its own mistakes rather than barrelling forward.

Safety HandlingN/A
/100

How well the model handles safety-sensitive prompts without false-refusing benign requests or producing unsafe output. The upstream signal does not separate refusal counts from substantive content-safety behaviour, so this single axis covers both.

Reliability monitor

Loading drift signal…

Hosted endpoints

HostInput $/MOutput $/MContextSpeedTTFTUptime 24hQuant
Host Emaker's API$0.50$2.501.1M——100.0%unknown
Host Bmaker's API$1.00$5.001.1M——100.0%unknown
Host Fmaker's API$2.00$10.001.1M——100.0%unknown
Anonymised third-party hosts. Sorted by lowest output price. Speed and time to first token are medians from our nightly probe where measured; uptime is the catalog's 24-hour figure.

Effort variants

Same API model, different reasoning budget. Thinking / xHigh modes usually score better on reasoning benchmarks but emit many more output tokens per request. Higher effort is also an alternative to running a team of agents: check whether the extra points are worth the extra output.

VariantIndexvs this pageBlended $/MOutput tokens
GPT-6.1 Terra—this page$1.001×
GPT-6.1 Terra Propro——$1.0010×

Output tokens are the typical multiple of a standard answer that the cost calculator assumes for each effort level; hidden reasoning bills as output.

Compare with...