Value ranking
Best value on Format Adherence
As of October 25, 2026, the best value on Format Adherence is GPT-6 Luna, at 2000.00 normalized points per dollar of input price ($0.05 per million tokens, score 100.0).
How reliably the model produces output in the requested format (JSON schemas, markdown structures, exact-string responses). Pairs well with IFEval but reflects how the deployed API is behaving day to day rather than how a frozen test set scores.
“Value” is normalized benchmark score (0–100 for this leaderboard cohort) divided by input price per million tokens. Higher means more capability per dollar on this axis only — always sanity-check latency, context length, and your real workload.
- 1GPT-6 LunaOpenAI2000.00100.0 / $0.05/M
- 2GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI630.4063.0 / $0.10/M
- 3DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423DeepSeek592.9754.0 / $0.09/M
- 4DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423DeepSeek478.93100.0 / $0.21/M
- 5Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle455.0068.3 / $0.15/M
- 6Gemini 3.8 FlashGoogle266.67100.0 / $0.38/M
- 7GPT-6 SolOpenAI100.00100.0 / $1.00/M
- 8GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI59.7959.8 / $1.00/M
- 9GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI50.00100.0 / $2.00/M
- 10Kimi K3Moonshot (Kimi)33.33100.0 / $3.00/M
- 11GPT-5.5OpenAI23.8959.7 / $2.50/M
- 12GLM 5.3Zhipu AI (GLM)19.8427.8 / $1.40/M
- 13Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic19.7098.5 / $5.00/M
- 14Claude Opus 5Anthropic19.0495.2 / $5.00/M
- 15Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic16.2965.2 / $4.00/M
- 16Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot (Kimi)15.0614.3 / $0.95/M
- 17Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic14.5629.1 / $2.00/M
- 18Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic13.4667.3 / $5.00/M
- 19Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic13.2039.6 / $3.00/M
- 20Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic9.1918.4 / $2.00/M
- 21Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic8.6143.1 / $5.00/M
- 22GPT-6 AstraOpenAI8.3741.8 / $5.00/M
- 23Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic1.2612.6 / $10.00/M
- 24GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI0.000.0 / $1.00/M
AI Model Analyzer does not recommend specific vendors; rankings are derived from public data only.